If business is war, then what tactics amount to war crimes when two companies are in direct competition? A Philadelphia jury handed up a defense verdict in a $26 million case in which Chelsea Property Group Inc., the world's largest operator of outlet malls, was accused of sabotaging a Poconos-area businessman's attempts to create his own outlet center in the area. Jurors were instructed on a state "competitor's privilege" defense to claims of tortious interference with prospective business relations.
July 21, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
If business is war, then what tactics amount to war crimes when two companies are in direct competition?
On Tuesday morning, a Philadelphia jury handed up a defense verdict in a case in which the world’s largest operator of outlet malls was accused of sabotaging a successful Poconos-area businessman’s attempts to create his own outlet center in the area.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
