The adequacy of warnings on a container of a wood-finishing product means that a family’s state court claim should not have been ruled to be pre-empted under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, a federal appeals court has ruled.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that state failure-to-warn claims should not have been dismissed in the Eastern District of New York because the warning labels on the product clearly ran afoul of the act and its regulations.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]