In a major ruling on Proposition 64, a Los Angeles appellate court has made it far more difficult for false advertising class actions to be filed under the state’s unfair competition law.

In a 21-page ruling released late Tuesday, the 2nd District Court of Appeal held that under Prop 64 — the 2004 ballot measure that restricted private attorney general suits — the “mere likelihood” of injury is no longer enough to have standing to file a class action under the UCL’s fraudulent acts provision.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]