A woman who lost a fee dispute case against her divorce lawyer is entitled to a new trial because the attorney repeatedly brought up the fact that the client’s malpractice action had been dismissed, the Appellate Division, 3rd Department, held last week.

The court said the lack of sufficiently curative instructions may well have confused the jury and misled it into concluding that the quality of the lawyer’s services was no longer an issue since the legal malpractice claim had been dismissed.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]