Ordinarily, an award of more than $337,000 in attorney fees and costs in a successful insurance bad faith case would be great news for the plaintiffs team.
Unless, of course, they were hoping for an award of $2.3 million.
Ordinarily, an award of more than $337,000 in attorney fees and costs in a successful insurance bad faith case would be great news for the plaintiffs team. Unless, of course, they were hoping for an award of $2.3 million. That's what happened in Jurinko v. The Medical Protective Co., a case in which Mark Tanner and Peter Newman of 15-attorney Feldman, Shepherd, Wohlgelernter, Tanner and Weinstock won a verdict of more than $7.9 million -- the largest-ever bad faith insurance verdict in Pennsylvania.
June 29, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Ordinarily, an award of more than $337,000 in attorney fees and costs in a successful insurance bad faith case would be great news for the plaintiffs team.
Unless, of course, they were hoping for an award of $2.3 million.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS