In a recent criminal case, the antitrust division of the Department of Justice took the position — and a federal court agreed — that statements employees make during proffer sessions with the government can be used against their employer at trial, even though the company was not a party to the proffer agreement and was represented by separate counsel.

The government argued that it was permitted to use employees’ statements in this way because they are vicarious admissions by the company itself. As far as the government and the court were concerned in that case, the only facts that mattered were that the employee worked at the company at the time of the proffer and made statements about things he did as part of his job.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]