A state judge in Manhattan has declined to dismiss a suit by Viacom shareholders alleging that the company’s board of directors had paid its top three executives exorbitant compensation at the same time that the corporation was losing billions of dollars.

Justice Charles E. Ramos of the Supreme Court’s Commercial Division ruled in In re Viacom Inc. Shareholder Litigation, 602527/05, that shareholders had presented sufficient facts to support a claim of a breach of fiduciary duty against the board of directors for granting almost $160 million in annual compensation to chairman and CEO Sumner Redstone and co-presidents and chief operating officers Thomas E. Freston and Leslie Moonves.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]