The Supreme Court said Monday it will weigh in on a fight over whether a large sawmill operator in the Pacific Northwest drove a competitor out of business with predatory buying practices. The Bush administration asked the justices to take the case, arguing that the 9th Circuit -- which affirmed a $78.8 million judgment against the company -- erred by setting a low and confusing standard that "threatens to chill pro-competitive conduct."
June 27, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Supreme Court said Monday it will weigh in on a fight over whether a large sawmill operator in the Pacific Northwest drove a competitor out of business with predatory buying practices.
Lawyers for Weyerhaeuser Co., one of the largest hardwood lumber manufacturers in the world, want justices to overturn an appellate court decision that allowed a $78.8 million judgment against the company.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
