An inconclusive legal opinion released Thursday by the California Judges Association will probably disappoint members angry over a controversial proposal that would force judges back into the classroom. Attorneys for Munger, Tolles & Olson, hired by the CJA, said in a memo that the Judicial Council appears to have the administrative authority to require judges to complete continuing education coursework -- and that the proposed rule changes would also probably pass constitutional muster.
June 26, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
An inconclusive legal opinion released Thursday by the California Judges Association will probably disappoint members angry over a controversial proposal that would force judges back to the classroom.
Attorneys for Munger, Tolles & Olson, hired by the CJA, said in a 21-page memo that the Judicial Council appears to have the administrative authority to require judges to complete 30 hours of continuing education coursework every three years.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
