A federal appeals court has vacated a defendant’s sentence of home confinement for violating the antitrust laws, finding it unreasonably lenient even under the now-advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.

The decision is one of the first, if not the first, where the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has found that a substantial deviation from the recommended guidelines sentence must be reversed because it was unreasonable.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]