In a strongly worded 21-page decision, an Appellate Division, 1st Department, panel rebuked a Manhattan judge Thursday for establishing a pattern over the last few years of consistently and improperly intervening in the questioning of witnesses.

In its unsigned opinion People v. Melendez, 8200, the panel upheld a jury’s conviction of a Manhattan man on felony drug charges, but criticized acting Supreme Court Justice Arlene R. Silverman’s interference during the prosecution’s direct examination of witnesses.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]