At issue before the California Supreme Court last week was whether telephone callers in Georgia, where calls can be recorded with one person's permission, violate California criminal and civil statutes by taping calls placed to the Golden State, where all parties' consent is required before recording. The Georgia statute prevailed at the appellate level, but the high court appeared to disagree, even though the one-person consent law falls in line with those of about 40 other states.
June 05, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Reaching out and touching someone with a telephone call is one thing. Recording the conversation is another.
That’s what the California Supreme Court indicated Thursday during oral arguments in San Francisco in a case involving competing privacy right statutes in California and Georgia.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
