A vehicle manufacturer is required to take precautions against negligent driving; where the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence regarding the alleged negligent conduct of the driver, the misuse defense may not be presented to the jury. Ricci v. AB Volvo et al., NO. 03-15635, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, July 27, 2004.

In 1997, a Volvo 740 operated by Ricci drifted off the highway and rolled over three times. Ricci suffered spinal compression from the crushed roof and was rendered quadriplegic. Ricci commenced an action against Volvo, alleging that the roof did not sufficiently withstand the impact of a rollover and that the seat belt system was defective. Volvo argued that Ricci’s negligence caused the accident.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]