FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) governing the disclosure of expert witnesses in federal court was adopted in 1993 with the hope that “the length of the deposition of such experts should be reduced, and in many cases the report may eliminate the need for a deposition” altogether. Advisory Committee Notes, Fed. R. Civ. Pro., Rule 26, 28 U.S.C.A. (1993).

Despite widespread adoption and enforcement of the expert disclosure rule during the past 4 years (following imposition of a “nationally uniform practice” in December 2000, see Advisory Committee Notes, Fed. R. Civ. Pro., Rule 26, 28 U.S.C.A. (2000)), ample anecdotal evidence suggests that expert witness depositions today are nearly as lengthy – and just as common – as they were before the 1993 amendments.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]