Take extortion, rape allegations and malicious prosecution, mix in a world-famous Irish dancer and a few angry Southern California lawyers and you have the unique ingredients for a major ruling on the state’s anti-SLAPP law.

On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court will hear arguments in three cases that could determine how much protection the 14-year-old statute provides individuals — lawyers in the cases at hand — allegedly sued for exercising their free speech rights.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]