Goldman Sachs is not required to honor the unvested stock options and unvested, contingent rights to restricted-stock units its former employee held at the time of his termination, the Appellate Division, 1st Department, has held.

“[T]he question presented is whether these unvested rights to equity-based compensation constitute ‘wages’ within the meaning of article 6 of the Labor Law,” Justice David Friedman wrote for the 3-2 majority in Guiry v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 6341.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]