Circumstantial evidence may be used to grant a plaintiff summary judgment on the issue of liability — but not very often — the New York Court of Appeals said Tuesday in clarifying the circumstances under which res ipsa loquitur evidence is sufficient for summary judgment or a directed verdict.

Judge Albert M. Rosenblatt, writing for the unanimous court in Morejon v. Rais Construction Co., 61, left no doubt that such evidence will not normally entitle a plaintiff to a directed verdict or summary judgment. But he declined to close that door entirely, holding that there are cases, albeit rare ones, where a plaintiff could prevail at summary judgment on res ipsa loquitur.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]