A woman may seek punitive damages for a bite she received from one of the Hamptons’ most famous dogs, Oreo, the 9-year-old cockapoo of advertising executive and restaurateur Jerry Della Femina and TV personality Judy Licht, a Manhattan judge has ruled.

“[A]mple evidence exists from which the trier of fact could infer that defendants were aware of Oreo’s tendency to bite, but deliberately failed to prevent further incidents,” Supreme Court Justice Joan A. Madden (See Profile) ruled in Marsh v. Della Femina. “Defendants’ knowledge of Oreo’s propensity to bite is … relevant to plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages, i.e. whether defendants consciously and recklessly disregarded the danger posed by Oreo.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]