Weighing in on the admissibility of clinical practice guidelines in medical malpractice, the New York Court of Appeals on Tuesday unanimously found that an upstate trial judge properly permitted the defendant to introduce an algorithm, or flow chart, to explain why a doctor followed a particular course of action.

But the ruling, eagerly awaited by medical malpractice attorneys on both sides of the courtroom, was limited in scope, largely fact-specific and seemingly did little to finally resolve the question of whether such guidelines can be admitted without violating the hearsay rule.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]