The Supreme Court refused Monday to block a defamation lawsuit against The New York Times over columns about the still-unsolved mailing of anthrax-laced letters that killed five people and sickened 17 not long after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. A federal judge had thrown out Steven Hatfill's suit against the newspaper over columns that faulted the FBI for failing to thoroughly investigate the ex-Army scientist, but the 4th Circuit reinstated the suit.
March 28, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Supreme Court refused Monday to block a defamation lawsuit against The New York Times over columns that linked a former Army scientist to the 2001 anthrax killings.
Authorities have never solved the mysterious mailing of anthrax-laced letters that killed five people and sickened 17 not long after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
