A violation of the Confrontation Clause was harmless error in the case of a repeat felony offender convicted of conspiracy to rob a bank, a federal appeals court has ruled.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that evidence of a conspiracy that existed aside from the testimony of a co-conspirator was sufficient to ensure that Vernon Snype’s constitutional rights were not violated at his trial for the 2002 robbery of a Yonkers, N.Y., bank.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]