A violation of the Confrontation Clause was harmless error in the case of a repeat felony offender convicted of conspiracy to rob a bank, a federal appeals court has ruled.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that evidence of a conspiracy that existed aside from the testimony of a co-conspirator was sufficient to ensure that Vernon Snype’s constitutional rights were not violated at his trial for the 2002 robbery of a Yonkers, N.Y., bank.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]