Amr Mohsen was apparently just bargaining over the cost of killing a federal judge -- not actually commissioning his murder -- in a videotaped jailhouse conversation, a California jury decided last week. In a case that began with a relatively routine piece of patent litigation, the erstwhile Silicon Valley millionaire was convicted on charges of witness tampering and soliciting arson, but the jury found that he wasn't guilty of trying to kill U.S. District Judge William Alsup.
March 20, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Amr Mohsen was apparently just bargaining over the cost of killing a federal judge — not actually commissioning his murder — in a jailhouse conversation videotaped in 2004, a jury decided Wednesday.
The erstwhile Silicon Valley millionaire was convicted on charges of witness tampering and soliciting arson, but the jury found that he wasn’t guilty of trying to kill U.S. District Judge William Alsup.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
