The net worth of a successor corporation is relevant to the issue of punitive damages, even though the alleged outrageous conduct was performed by a predecessor, a northeastern Pennsylvania judge has ruled in an issue of first impression.

In a 138-page opinion in Busy Bee Inc. v. Wachovia Bank, PICS Case No. 06-0339 (C.P. Lackawanna 2006) Nealon, J. (138 pages), Lackawanna County Common Pleas Judge Terrence R. Nealon said that he would allow evidence of Wachovia Bank’s present wealth in a case on punitive damages — not the wealth of CoreStates Bank, the smaller regional bank that allegedly engaged in the outrageous conduct.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]