A law firm that avoided a legal malpractice suit by directing its former clients to sue another party cannot seek dismissal of a subsequent malpractice claim against it on statute of limitations grounds, a state judge has ruled.
The plaintiffs claim former New York law firm Battle Fowler committed malpractice by failing to include language in a 1991 agreement that would have protected the capital of parties withdrawing from a Rhode Island real estate investment partnership.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]