Denying a person the right to consult counsel before he or she decides to submit to a blood alcohol content test after an arrest for driving under the influence is constitutional, according to a three-judge Pennsylvania Superior Court panel.

Judge John T. Bender said that while the tactical decision to submit to the test can be “critical” to the defendant, it is not so critical as to invoke the right to counsel.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]