A new trial is warranted for a case in which a Philadelphia judge did not permit plaintiffs counsel to voir dire prospective jurors as to their knowledge of the medical malpractice crisis issue, an en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled in a 6-3 decision.

Reversing Judge Mary D. Colins, the majority in Capoferri v. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia noted the substantial media coverage of the so-called med-mal crisis when the trial in that case got under way in late 2003.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]