A California appeal court briefly entertained the possibility of rehearing a legal malpractice case involving Silicon Valley IP law firm Fish & Richardson, then backtracked and reissued its original opinion. With the move, the 1st District Court of Appeal reinstated most of a $30 million malpractice award against Fish & Richardson for failing to file a patent application in a timely manner for chemical digital imaging client Kairos Scientific Inc.
January 31, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A California appeal court briefly entertained the possibility of rehearing a legal malpractice case involving Silicon Valley IP law firm Fish & Richardson, then backtracked and reissued its original opinion.
With the move, the 1st District Court of Appeal reinstated most of a $30 million malpractice award against Fish & Richardson for failing to file a patent application in a timely manner for chemical digital imaging client Kairos Scientific Inc.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
