New Jersey's Supreme Court is set to resolve a long-running debate over setting limits on lawyer advertising that features clients attesting to their attorneys' skills. The court is soliciting comments on a proposed guideline that would ban ads -- including Web site postings -- in which client testimonials address the quality of work an attorney has performed. A partner with Levinson Axelrod says the law firm will consider a federal suit if the court adopts the proposal.
January 19, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The state Supreme Court is set to resolve a long-running debate over setting limits on lawyer advertising that features clients attesting to their attorneys’ skills.
The court is soliciting comments on Proposed Guideline 4, which would ban ads — including Web site postings — in which client testimonials address the quality of work an attorney has performed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
