New Yorkers will have to go elsewhere to get Freaky Ice, following a decision handed down by an appellate court Tuesday. The panel affirmed a state Supreme Court decision upholding a liquor board's denial of an application to register labeling for the fruity frozen "malt beverage." The State Liquor Authority found potential for confusion and deception of the public in the proposed labels, which say in small type that Freaky Ice contains alcohol and should not be sold or served to children.
January 13, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
New Yorkers will have to go elsewhere to get Freaky Ice, following a decision handed down Tuesday by the Appellate Division, 1st Department.
The makers of Freaky Ice — a frozen “malt beverage” that comes in Passion Cocktail, Cherry Fusion and Lemon Stinger flavors — had unsuccessfully petitioned the state Supreme Court to annul a State Liquor Authority decision that denied the company’s application to register labeling for the frozen alcoholic treat.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
