A state employee subjected to “recurrent explicit, hostile, vulgar, offensive and often demeaning comments based upon her gender” cannot sustaina workplace discrimination claim because she and the perpetrator, whileworking on a dual-agency project, were not employed by the same agency, anappellate panel held last week.
In a unanimous opinion, the Appellate Division, 3rd Department, upheldsummary dismissal of Suzanne R. Strauss’ suit against the state departmentsof Education and Labor.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]