The 9th Circuit's latest removal of federal Judge Manuel Real could mean a big-money trial for San Francisco plaintiffs lawyer Stephen Cox. In criticizing Real last week for issuing an opinion basically written by defendant E.I. DuPont de Nemours, a three-judge panel ordered the case be assigned to a new judge. That's a small victory for Cox, who in 1994 discovered that DuPont had submitted fraudulent test data in suits brought against it by growers who said the company's fungicide was damaging crops.
December 13, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ latest removal of notoriously truculent Los Angeles federal Judge Manuel Real could mean a big-money trial for San Francisco plaintiffs lawyer Stephen Cox.
In criticizing Real last week for issuing an opinion basically written by defendant E.I. DuPont de Nemours, a three-judge 9th Circuit panel ordered the case be assigned to a new judge.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
