Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Supreme Court nominee John Roberts should not avoid senators’ tough questions at his confirmation hearing next week, Sen. Charles Schumer said Thursday as he argued against using Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as Roberts’ role model for avoiding key issues. Republicans say Ginsburg declined to answer senators’ questions 55 times at her Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing, while Justice Stephen Breyer declined to answer questions 18 times. Conservative group Progress for America is running a television advertisement saying “As with Ginsburg, Judge Roberts should not answer questions that force him to prejudge cases.” But Schumer, a New Yorker and member of the Judiciary Committee, argued in a speech Thursday that Ginsburg had a clearer paper trail given her 13 years as a federal appeals judge, and that she was a consensus candidate since President Clinton consulted with Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah before naming her to the court. Roberts became a federal judge in 2003. “If Judge Roberts repeatedly resorts to the so-called ‘Ginsburg Precedent,’ it will sound less like a principled refusal to answer and more like a variation on the Fifth Amendment: ‘I refuse to answer that question on the ground that it may incriminate me. Answering may reveal my actual views about constitutional law and cause me to lose votes,’” said Schumer, chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. When asked if an evasive Roberts would cause Democrats to stage a filibuster, Schumer said the hearings will determine the answer. “You have to be at the hearing and see what happens. Now, if he is a Miguel Estrada, and just refuses abjectly to answer everything, it would make a filibuster more likely,” Schumer said. “You can’t rule it out right now, but I wouldn’t say we would definitely do it under this, this or this circumstance. You have to wait and see how Judge Roberts answers questions.” Democrats demanded that former U.S. Appeals Court nominee Estrada publicly answer more of their questions or the White House release Estrada’s working papers from his time at the Justice Department solicitor general’s office. The White House refused, and Democrats were able to sustain a filibuster on Estrada. Copyright 2005 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.