Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A 4-4 split by an en banc Pennsylvania Superior Court panel means that a top Philadelphia judge's rulings against two asbestos plaintiffs have been allowed to stand. Philadelphia Complex Litigation Center Coordinating Judge Norman C. Ackerman had originally held that the plaintiffs -- both longtime smokers who did not yet suffer from illnesses undeniably caused by asbestos exposure -- could not prove asbestos-related injuries, and so granted the defendants' summary judgment motions.
August 30, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS