Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A jury in a federal medical malpractice case "reached a seriously erroneous result" and its verdict represents a "miscarriage of justice," a New York federal judge has held in a relatively rare rejection of a jury's determination. The judge found the verdict inconsistent in that the panel held that a medical procedure was performed absent informed consent, that if there had been informed consent the procedure would not have been allowed, and that the patient was injured but not as a result of negligence.
August 25, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS