Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A New York judge has enunciated the legal distinction between prostitution and paying someone to participate in sexual activity to make a porn film, writing that prostitution requires person A paying person B for sexual actions on A, while pornography involves person C paying B for sexual activity performed on A. The distinction arose because the defendant, accused of running a multimillion-dollar prostitution ring, argued that not charging the "Goliaths" of the porn industry was selective prosecution.
August 02, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS