A New York judge has enunciated the legal distinction between prostitution and paying someone to participate in sexual activity to make a porn film, writing that prostitution requires person A paying person B for sexual actions on A, while pornography involves person C paying B for sexual activity performed on A. The distinction arose because the defendant, accused of running a multimillion-dollar prostitution ring, argued that not charging the "Goliaths" of the porn industry was selective prosecution.
August 02, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania with their dedication to law.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Farber, Brocks & Zane, LLP is seeking to add legal talent to its active and growing insurance coverage practice group. For our Garden Ci...
4-6 Years Minimum Experience with General Liability defense, Property Damage, Labor Law defense. Must be admitted in NY and NJ. Trial experi...
Downtown AV-rated insurance defense law firm seeks an associate with 2 to 8 years of Workers Compensation insurance defense experience. Req...
SCHIRMER LAW LLC Celebrating 7 years of Excellent Service
Pond Lehocky Giordano LLP would like to announce that....
HARTMANN DOHERTY ROSA BERMAN & BULBULIA LLC's Matrimonial & Family Practice Warmly Welcomes the Honorable Peter J. Melchionne (Ret.) to Lead its New Family Law Dispute Resolution Team.
