Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A Manhattan federal judge has ruled that a bankrupt asbestos manufacturer may not pierce the attorney-client privilege to depose the plaintiffs lawyers it claims conspired to inundate it with spurious claims. G-I Holdings Inc. claimed the lawyers may have breached a settlement agreement, and that deposing them was the only way it could gather evidence of the breaches. The judge held that G-I's argument ignored the principle that the privilege belonged to the client, not the attorney.
July 25, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS