Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Crowded out by socially explosive decisions, two of the last cases of the Supreme Court term received little comment. Deciding a pair of cases in a single opinion, the Court held that the supplemental jurisdiction statute changed the rules regarding determination of the minimum amount in controversy for establishing diversity jurisdiction. Robert E. Bartkus finds the relative silence concerning the decision unfortunate, as it has key jurisprudential and practical effects on litigation in federal court.
July 15, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS