The Supreme Court on Tuesday intervened again in a long-running fight over protests outside abortion clinics. Justices said they will consider whether an anti-abortion group's campaign conducted outside the clinics 20 years ago may have violated federal racketeering and extortion laws. A Court ruling in 2003 lifted a nationwide ban on protests that interfere with abortion clinic business. An appeals court, however, questioned whether the ban should be renewed on other legal grounds.
June 29, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Supreme Court on Tuesday intervened again in a long-running fight over protests outside abortion clinics.
Justices said they will consider whether an anti-abortion group’s campaign against abortions, conducted outside these clinics 20 years ago, may have violated federal racketeering and extortion laws.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
