The Oakland Raiders got a crucial first down in a $1.2 billion suit against the National Football League when California's high court agreed Wednesday to review the case for possible appellate error. The court's unanimous decision gives the Raiders a chance to prove their contention that Los Angeles' 2nd District Court of Appeal erred by reversing a trial court judge who had granted the team a new trial based on juror misconduct. The team claims the NFL interfered in plans for a new stadium.
June 10, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Oakland Raiders got a crucial first down in a $1.2 billion suit against the National Football League on Wednesday when the California Supreme Court agreed to review the case for possible appellate error.
The court’s unanimous decision gives the Raiders a chance to prove their contention that Los Angeles’ 2nd District Court of Appeal erred four months ago by reversing a trial court judge who had granted the team a new trial based on juror misconduct.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
