Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
While deliberating the fate of an accused murderer five years ago, California jurors were allowed to revisit the crime scene, but the defendant and his lawyer weren't permitted to go along. On Thursday during oral arguments, the California Supreme Court appeared to think that was a mistake because jurors essentially took new evidence from the site and the defense lawyer was deprived of objecting to that evidence in person.
June 06, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS