Appeals Court: No Legal Damages for Ex-Bully Over Eminem's 'Brain Damage'

A man who admits picking on Eminem when they were schoolmates cannot sue the rapper over a song about the bullying, the Michigan Court of Appeals has held. The panel said a "reasonable listener" would not take literally the lyrics, which includes Eminem singing that his "whole brain fell out" of his skull. The appeals court upheld a ruling by a trial court judge who had composed her own rap, which concluded, "It is therefore this Court's ultimate position/that Eminem is entitled to summary disposition."

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A man who admits picking on Eminem when they were schoolmates cannot sue the rapper over a song that depicts his bullying as a brain-jarring attack, the Michigan Court of Appeals said. “Brain Damage,” released on 1999′s “The Slim Shady LP,” was not intended to be taken literally, a three-judge panel said in an opinion released Friday, dismissing a lawsuit filed by sanitation worker Deangelo Bailey. Eminem, whose real name is Marshall Mathers III, says in the song Bailey beat him up in a school bathroom, banging his head on a urinal and choking him. Bailey sued in 2001, accusing the Detroit-area rapper of invading his privacy by publicizing unreasonable information that put him in a false light. Bailey admitted that he picked on Mathers but said he merely “bumped” him at school and threw a “little shove.” The court cited song lyrics in which Eminem said the school principal stomped on him, leaving him for dead. Those lyrics along with others — Eminem singing that his “whole brain fell out” of his skull — would not be taken literally by a “reasonable listener,” the judges wrote. The court also ruled that Bailey failed to present a genuine factual issue in the suit. Mary Massaron Ross, an attorney for Eminem, applauded the decision. “The fact that there may have been differences in the precise facts didn’t matter because the gist of the story was true by Bailey’s own admission” she said. Bailey’s attorney, Byron Nolen, said he wasn’t surprised by the ruling and will not appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court. “I don’t think (the justices) would even look at it to be honest with you,” Nolen said. The appeals court upheld a 2003 decision by a Macomb County judge who composed a rap of her own to help explain her ruling. “The lyrics are stories no one would take as fact/they’re an exaggeration of a childish act,” Circuit Judge Deborah Servitto wrote. “It is therefore this Court’s ultimate position/that Eminem is entitled to summary disposition.” Copyright 2005 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Trending Stories

 

Featured Product

Global Briefing

A weekly, curated selection of our international content from around the globe, across the business of law, in-house, regulatory, technology and more, with expert insights from our senior editors.

Learn More

More from ALM

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Privacy Policy

About Us / Contact Us / Site Map / Advertise With Us/ Customer Service / Terms of Service/ FAQ / Privacy Policy

Publications

Law Topics

Rankings

More

Law.com

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.