Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A New York appellate panel has thrown out a $4.8 million verdict, holding that the trial judge improperly entered a verdict based on an "unannounced, unaffirmed and rejected" verdict sheet. Jurors were instructed to decide the case on the basis of 12 questions on a verdict sheet, but failed to follow the sheet's instructions. The panel found a violation of "hornbook law" because the verdict was not affirmed in open court, nor were the parties afforded the right to poll the jury about its answers.
April 07, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS