Indian tribes can't expand their tax-exempt holdings by buying up property that has been outside their reservations for generations, the Supreme Court ruled in an 8-1 decision Tuesday. The Court found that New York's Oneida Indian Nation may not upend 190 years of local development and regulation by reverting recently acquired land to tax-exempt status.
March 30, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Indian tribes can’t expand their tax-exempt holdings by buying up property that has been outside their reservations for generations, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.
The 8-1 decision found that New York’s Oneida Indian Nation may not upend 190 years of local development and regulation by reverting recently acquired land to tax-exempt status.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
