Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
In a decision filled with language about the concept and feel of design elements, a Southern District of New York magistrate judge found a rug maker had not infringed on a competitor's designs. The court's analysis involved a side-by-side comparison of the rugs. The judge found that there was no "substantial similarity," describing David Nicholls' Prado design as cool and highly structured while seeing James Tufenkian's Eclipse rugs as warmer and casual.
March 28, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS