Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Taking DNA samples from criminal defendants on supervised release does not violate their constitutional rights because the government's interest in building a DNA database outweighs the minimal intrusion into the offender's diminished expectation of privacy, the 3rd Circuit has ruled. The panel voted to reject a challenge to the DNA Act in which a convicted bank robber argued that extraction of his blood without individualized suspicion of criminal wrongdoing violated his 4th Amendment rights.
March 23, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS