Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The Justice Department Monday announced it will require two hospitals in southern West Virginia to stop agreements that illegally divided the market for cancer and cardiac surgery. The move indicates that federal authorities are taking their scrutiny of anti-competitive behavior to even the smallest markets, especially in the healthcare industry but by implication in any industry where erstwhile competitors strike cooperative agreements. It also shows that federal regulators continue to pursue antitrust violations by hospitals, despite losing several cases against the hospital industry in recent years. The two hospitals, Bluefield Regional Medical Center Inc. and Princeton Community Hospital Association Inc., violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by agreeing privately between themselves which of them would provide what types of specialized care, according to spokesmen for the DOJ’s antitrust division. BRMC and PCH subsequently made joint filings with the state of West Virginia to request certificates of need, or CONs, for BRMC to provide cardiac-surgery services and for PCH to provide cancer services. A CON is a permit required to enter certain areas of the healthcare market; generally, the applicant must demonstrate to a state authority that there is an unmet need for its services. BRMC and PCH had been head-to-head competitors in cancer services and potential competitors in cardiac-surgery services. The complaint alleges that the agreements effectively allocated markets for cancer and cardiac-surgery services and restrained competition to the detriment of consumers. The agreements affected consumers in six West Virginia and three Virginia counties. In a lawsuit filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, the DOJ claimed the two hospitals decided that one of them would not seek state authorization to provide cardiac surgery while the other would decline to provide various cancer services, effectively restraining competition for the two services. “It is essential to maintain competition and choice in this important industry so that consumers will be provided with the best possible options for their healthcare needs,” said J. Bruce McDonald, deputy assistant attorney general in the department’s antitrust division. “The Sherman Act clearly prohibits hospitals and other competitors from engaging in this type of market allocation scheme.” Copyright �2005 TDD, LLC. All rights reserved.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.