Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The impact the Internet has had on growing revenues, increasing profit and strengthening businesses’ bottom line — whether electronic or brick-and-mortar — has been tremendous. And just as in the general business sector, matrimonial attorneys have recognized the Internet as promoting a variety of goals for themselves and their clients: ��Identification and substantiation of claims and defenses; ��Discovery of data that permits the parties to better evaluate their respective positions; ��The simplification and narrowing of issues; and ��An aid for the conduct of the trial. A brief primer on Internet law follows, including tips on how every matrimonial lawyer can use the Internet to his or her advantage. A PERFECT MARRIAGE Add an Internet expert to the matrimonial law team. Matrimonial attorneys often rely on the opinions of experts, such as psychologists and economists, whose knowledge, skill, experience, training or education can enhance the understanding and analysis of relevant facts. An Internet expert should be added to the matrimonial law attorney’s team to help find assets, protect client communications and data, and provide live court testimony. An Internet expert may also help a matrimonial team with discovery. Courts have considered e-mail and instant messaging writings that fall within the scope of discovery. An Internet expert can locate and inspect the potentially useful information without being oppressive or burdensome. INTRODUCING INTERNET DATA Internet data are subject to the same foundational requirements as data imprinted or written on paper. Once the appropriate foundation is laid, courts have not hesitated to admit Internet data under the business-records exception even in the absence of a statute or rule. To lay the proper evidentiary foundation, the proponent must demonstrate that the information was derived from a reliable source, the Internet records were made and maintained pursuant to a routine procedure designed to ensure that the data were accurately converted into a readable form, and the Internet information is unaltered. INTERNET EVIDENCE IS SPECIAL Internet evidence includes information in the form of databases, operating systems, applications programs and e-mail. A matrimonial attorney should consider conducting his own review on the Internet to find out what others would discover about his or her client if they conducted such a search. It should be noted that people routinely use the Internet to communicate information they would never put in writing. NET EVIDENCE IS DIFFERENT FROM PAPER EVIDENCE The most obvious difference is associated with getting the evidence before the court. For instance, in most jurisdictions a person may authenticate a writing or an invoice by proving that he or she recognizes the signature as that of the author, and that the paper document has not been tainted. In the event that a party declines to admit he or she is the author of an e-mail, the conventional paper-authentication procedure doesn’t apply. This is particularly true if the e-mail came from a different account than the alleged e-author’s. Recommendation: Treat the admission of e-mail as you would telephone conversations. Another distinction between e-evidence and traditional evidence is e-evidence’s enduring nature. Conventional evidence, particularly records, typically resides in a single physical location. Paper records are easily discarded, but destroying e-evidence is more difficult. Contrary to popular belief, hitting the delete button does not destroy Internet information. INTERNET CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATIONS E-mail and other Internet communications become confidential only when a client prepares them for the purpose of transmitting information to aid the attorney’s representation. If creation of the Internet communication predates the attorney-client relationship, then the Internet communication, if not already subject to privilege, doesn’t become privileged by virtue of its transfer to the attorney’s possession. Typically, however, court process must be used to obtain these documents from the attorney. An attorney has an ethical obligation to prevent third persons from obtaining client confidences through unauthorized access to his or her e-mail, and other Internet communications. To do that, the attorney should consider sending confidential information in password-protected attachments. If a client chooses, however, to reveal otherwise confidential information to, or in the presence of, people who are not part of the attorney-client relationship (such as in a chat room), then the protection of the privilege may be sacrificed. Attorneys should establish law-office procedures that minimize the likelihood of privileged materials sent via the Internet being intercepted. Such procedures might entail: ��The segregation of privileged and nonprivileged materials; ��The use of password-protected Internet mailboxes; ��The development of an Internet security system set up to allow for only carefully controlled circulation of privileged materials to authorized personnel; and ��A policy of documenting when, and for what purposes, those authorized personnel should gain access to these confidential Internet files. INTERNET-GENERATED EVIDENCE Evidence generated in cyberspace normally involves use of materials found on the Internet that support evidence before the trial court. This evidence includes Internet programs that run simulations based on those elements of evidence projecting what the results would be. The programs include those that deal with: ��Establishing spousal and child support; ��Equalizing and balancing property distributions; ��Determining value of future interests and deferred compensation; and ��Establishing the difference between immediate and deferred value of pensions. Note, too, that an appropriate objection could be raised about lack of foundation. Demonstrating the appropriateness of the Internet program’s author, the foundation on which it is brought into being and the source of the data that was entered into the program can surmount the objection. SECURE COMMUNICATIONS ALWAYS During client intake, most family practitioners address the sensitive issue of how to get in touch with the client without revealing themselves to the potential adversary. Secure fax numbers and mailing addresses are often used or suggested. As clients and lawyers become increasingly technologically sophisticated, there are new technologies available to preserve the confidentiality of e-mail and hide e-mailers’ identity. If a system is set up properly, matrimonial lawyers and clients can keep their communications private, and ensure that no one knows they are communicating. The reality, however, is that many clients will continue to send and receive sensitive e-mails on their home or business computers despite warnings not to do that. Matrimonial lawyers have several options available to lessen the risk of inadvertent or intentional disclosure to or by an unauthorized third party. These include recommending that: ��The client use a new and anonymous e-mail address; ��Having a sweep done of the client’s computer or e-mail accounts by a technical consultant; and ��Opting either for or against the use of exclusive electronic delivery of certain legal documents. MORE THAN COMPUTERS Personal digital assistants (PDAs) often contain copies of e-mails, attachments, calendars and pictures. PDAs and similar devices are cause for concern and interest to the matrimonial lawyer who wants to maintain the integrity of “confidential” communications or gain admission into evidence of another’s communications. FOLLOW THE MONEY The Internet allows fast, efficient and thorough examination of financial records, and can help to uncover fraud. For example, when reviewing a financial affidavit in combination with past financial records that include wire transfers, enter the routing number of the bank accounts into www.fedwiredirectory.frb.org/search.cfm to see whether the bank account was listed on the affidavit. This is a fast and easy way to catch some bank and credit union accounts intentionally or carelessly left off of a financial affidavit. SHARE WISELY Matrimonial lawyers differ in their ability to collaborate and their feelings about collaborating with adversaries on nonmaterial aspects of their cases. Some will share “live” word processing documents during the inevitable drafting and redrafting of their financial affidavits. This prevents costly and wasteful secretarial costs for typing and retyping, office overhead costs associated with mail or facsimile expenses, and enables better-quality drafting through reduction of potential “scriber errors” in last-minute or midtrial settlement arrangements. While sharing live documents can benefit all parties, it must be done carefully to avoid problems. The primary land mine to avoid is the inadvertent transmission of prior attorney work product. Once an adversary has the most recent version of an electronic document, he or she may be able to extract from that document more than what is plainly visible on the normal word-processing window: Discarded edits, tracked document changes and comments that previous authors thought had been deleted may be saved. These tools are great for editors and others pursuing a truly collaborative work effort and are often preprogrammed into the most popular word-processing programs used by attorneys, but they can betray settlement points, tactical considerations and other sensitive information to adversaries. To avoid this problem, matrimonial attorneys should save files in rich text format [RTF] or convert the file to an Adobe PDF. DON’T FORGET TO GOOGLE! Running a name search through the popular search engine can produce pictures, r�sum�s and other useful information. Cold cases reopened for fraud can often present service-of-process problems for an attorney. In one case, a quick name search produced not only proof of current employment by the defendant, but a very recent picture from a trade publication that was instrumental in accomplishing foreign service. Jonathan Bick is counsel to WolfBlock Brach Eichler of Roseland, N.J., and is an adjunct professor of Internet law at Pace Law School and Rutgers Law School. He is a member of the Board of Editors for Internet Law & Strategy, E-Commerce Law & Strategy’s sister newsletter, and is also the author of “101 Things You Need To Know About Internet Law” (Random House 2000). You can reach him at [email protected] Jonathan Von Kohorn is an associate with Halloran & Sage in Westport, Conn. Reach him at [email protected] Subscribe to E-Commerce Law & Strategy.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.