A Brooklyn judge has left the door open for tenants who claim that emotional disabilities require an exception to no-pets policies, while closing the door to one particular family.

Justice David I. Schmidt ruled in an Article 78 proceeding that a girl’s terrier is not medically necessary under the law. Thus the managers of a Bensonhurst apartment building may evict the “anxious and depressed” 9-year-old and her mother for having the pet, he ruled.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]