The Supreme Court on Wednesday considered whether a jury that sentenced a convicted killer to death had properly taken into account his religious conversion, which a prosecutor incorrectly contended was irrelevant. Most of the justices seemed to agree that the prosecutor was wrong to make that assertion and that the trial judge should have corrected him, but they were divided over whether the errors made a difference in sentencing.
November 11, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
We are seeking a lawyer with a minimum of four years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowned C...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
City of Atlanta Office of the Public Defender Attorney I, Attorney II, Senior Attorney We are looking for passionate and dedicated atto...
Scura Wigfield Heyer Stevens & Cammarota, LLP
ShapiroCroland Attorneys at Law Take Pleasure in Announcing that VALERIE A. VLADYKA HAS JOINED THE FIRM AS COUNSEL Valerie concentrates her practice in Insurance coverage, Commercial Litigation and Probate Matters 411 Hackensack Avenue, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 Telephone: (201) 488-3900 | Telecopier: (201) 488-9481 |www.shapiro-croland.com November 2023
Congratulations to our Partner Richard Segal on becoming Chairman of the Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce
