Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
The U.S. Supreme Court grappled Wednesday with the issue of whether a sniff constitutes a search in a case that questions whether people who have given police no reason to suspect illegal activity have a constitutional protection against drug-sniffing dog searches. The Court must clarify earlier opinions that found drug dog use is not necessarily a search that falls under the Fourth Amendment ban on unreasonable searches or seizures.
November 11, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS